The Body (Weight and Composition) of Evidence in COPD-Juniper publishers
JUNIPER PUBLISHERS-OPEN ACCESS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PULMONARY & RESPIRATORY SCIENCES
Opinion
The importance of body weight in COPD in relation to
clinical outcomes has been deeply studied for many years. Large
population studies have shown since many years that a low Body Mass
Index (i.e. underweight, BMI< 20) is an independent strong predictor
of both all-cause and COPD-related mortality [1].
Noteworthy, it is the trajectory of weight changes
during time that has to be carefully considered in these patients, being
unintended weight loss an accepted determinant of reduced survival [2]
rather than a compensatory mechanism to decrease metabolic rate in the
advanced stages of the disease or an unavoidable epiphenomenon of the
very end-stage. Indeed, the most severe the disease, the higher the
prevalence of underweight patients [1,3]. A similar trend is related to
the emphysema extent, where an association with loss of fat and Fat-Free
Mass (FFM) has been observed, leading to a decreased BMI [4]. Moreover,
Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS) has been demonstrated to
significantly increase BMI and ameliorate health status [5]. Taken
together, these evidences suggest a close interaction between body
weight and the disease itself: different characteristics of the disease
(both clinical severity and pathological and anatomical features) have a
strong and significant impact on body weight and composition.
More recently, a careful look has been focused on
the other end of the BMI spectrum, with some evidences indicating a
protective role of overweight and obesity in comparison of not only
underweight, but also normal weight in COPD patients, the so called
“obesity paradox”[1]in terms of morbidity and mortality. Several
potential mechanisms have been proposed to explain this - probably
apparent but surely multifactorial - paradox [6]. Among them we can find
- again - disease characteristics, and body composition. In fact, the
beneficial effect of increased BMI is stronger in the severe cases. For
the latter point, it is not well understood if it is an excess in fat or
a preserved FFM that contributes to this survival advantage [2].To
address the last question, and to further describe the importance of
body composition in COPD, it may be useful to focus on the
subgroup of patients who show the characteristics of Sarcopenic Obesity
(SO).
Sarcopenia is defined by the simultaneous presence
of poor muscle function and a low muscle mass in older people[7], being
sarcopenic obesity a condition characterized by excessive body weight,
mostly with abdominal obesity, and a disproportional low muscle mass
[8]. This metabolic phenotype [2] is highly prevalent in COPD [8]:
subjects with SO were three times more frequent among COPD patients in
comparison to smokers and non-smokers controls among the participants to
the ECLIPSE study [9]. However, no mortality data are available for
this subgroup of patients to date and results evaluating functional
outcomes are conflicting since a reduction in physical performance
(reduction in the distance walked in 6 minutes) has been observed in SO
patients in comparison to sarcopenic non-obese [9], but also SO patients
showed a higher muscle strength compared to the sarcopenic non-obese in
another setting [8].
It is clear that the systemic burden of COPD plays a
pivotal role in the natural history of the disease and that the
multi-systems interaction is complex and far from a full comprehension.
Moreover, the natural history itself is a player to take into
consideration, since any intervention can have beneficial to detrimental
effects, depending on the timing of its action. As an example, related
to metabolism, the role of the Insulin - IGF-1 - mTOR pathway is
significant. A downregulation of this important nutrient signaling
pathway, has been shown to be related to an extended lifespan in
different species [10], slowing the aging process. COPD is related to
several hallmarks of aging (like chronic inflammation, cell senescence,
defective autophagy, increased oxidative stress) and mTOR levels are
elevated [11]. Of interest, some preclinical studies evaluating the mTOR
inhibitor rapamycin showed promising results, in terms of improvement
in lung function parameters [11]. However, inhibiting mTOR leads to a
decreased protein synthesis and eventually to a possible decreasing
muscle growth and possibly sarcopenia [12]. Muscle wasting in COPD is a
complex phenomenon, that involves different mechanisms during time [13],
being the mTOR pathway only a part of it, although important. Future
studies are
needed in the field.
In 1968 Filley et al.[14]described what is considered the
traditional classification of COPD, the definition of “Pink Puffers”
and “Blue Bloaters” [14], being body weight an important part
of the description. After 50 years, the definition is still relevant
while a bigger effort should be put in clinical settings and on
a daily basis in order to prevent the onset of the disease and
eventually its dramatic evolution.
To know more about Open Access International
Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Sciences please click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/ijoprs/index.php
To know more about Open access Journals
Publishers please click on : Juniper Publishers
To know more about juniper publishers: https://juniperpublishers.business.site/
Comments
Post a Comment